Young Democrats of Harford County

For Democrats of all ages and other like-minded folks in Harford County, Maryland.

Archive for the ‘George W. Bush’ Category

OCS Oil Drilling: The WRONG Approach

Posted by piperj3cub on July 15, 2008

The Democrats in Congress can go a long way at this point in time towards renewing my personal faith in the party… by NOT responding to Bush’s obnoxious tactic to try and open vast regions of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) to oil drilling.  Drilling in the regions of the OCS currently off-limits will have NO short-term impact on fuel prices (it could be argued that the speculation of future supplies may reduce the price of oil by a small amount, but in reality over the past 50 years any increase in domestic production has had little to no impact on the price of gasoline; these data are available from multiple government and industry sources).  Expanding regions of the OCS open for future drilling WILL however allow many cronies of the president to make millions of dollars, if not billions, by domestic exploration alone, much less actual drilling (remember that much of both Bush’s and Cheney’s stock portfolios are involved with corporations that specialize in oil exploration and extraction).

 

Still… the entire reasoning behind the president’s decision to ‘open’ the OCS for expanded research and drilling is the reduction of gasoline prices.  I say again that this legislation will have NO IMPACT on fuel prices.  So, why will the Democrats in congress support it?  It is getting increasingly bothersome to me that the Democratic Party is so willing to legislate rather than educate; our party’s position over the past decades on this issue has been the correct one!  We need to be telling America why we are correct, not change our policy because we think this will work against Obama in the presidential campaign.  The position of environmental protection is not a bad one.  In addition, if we want to truly impact fuel prices, we would be supporting increased economy standards for automobiles, and an overall energy-efficient economy.  The slight increase in future supply of oil will have a minimal impact on fuel prices compared to the almost instantaneous impact that higher fuel efficiency standards would have on demand.  Wake up Democratic Party… DO THE CORRECT THING!

Advertisements

Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, George W. Bush, Politics | Tagged: , , , | 11 Comments »

Ready for war?

Posted by Annie on January 13, 2008

I just read an article on msnbc entitled “Bush: Iran threatens global security…President says Arab allies must confront danger ‘before it’s too late.'”  You can read the full text of the article here.  If you haven’t noticed the build-up to war that’s been going on for months now, you haven’t been reading the news.  It sounds terrifyingly familiar to what happened before we invaded Iraq (remember the weapons of mass destruction?).  Not that I think Iran is a bed of roses but one would think that the Bush administration would have learned a lesson about unilaterally invading a country that hasn’t done anything aggressive to us or any other country.  I just hope that President Bush doesn’t get us into a situation where we have troops actively engaged on the group in three different countries as his adminstration’s last hurrah.  This is particularly upsetting after he knowingly misled the American people about the Iranian nuclear capabilities.  Recent U.S. intelligence states that Iran stopped its nuclear arms program in 2003, a fact that Bush chose to ignore when speaking about the topic.  How can our president blatantly lie about this to foment Americans’ fear and not be criticized for it? 

Posted in George W. Bush, Iran, War | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Our Progressive Agenda

Posted by piperj3cub on September 30, 2007

Why are we interested and involved in politics?  For me it is first and foremost a strong desire to see our country become more progressive; to recognize the inherent worth and dignity of all people in our country and the world.  This is accomplished through universal healthcare, fair wages, a fully-funded education system, and laws that protect the natural world around us and promote conservation of resources and the wildlife surrounding them.  Why am I a Democrat?  I know that the Democratic Party offers the BEST chance of moving the country towards those goals!

 

In a recent heated discussion, it was suggested that the Green Party is much more in-line with my values and beliefs, and as such I am “selling myself out” by being a dedicated member of the Democratic Party.  I could not disagree with this sentiment further.  In fact, I cannot help but feel that in America today, the presence of a third party is only a major detriment to progressive legislation.  It can be fairly argued that the obnoxious war in Iraq, the pitifully unfair tax system under which we currently labor, poor environmental laws and regulations, and the biased influence of corporations in crafting environmental, educational, and healthcare focused legislation is a result of the more “progressive” Green Party’s position in the 2000 general election.  It is abundantly clear that Al Gore would have been President had Ralph Nader not garnered 2% of the popular vote.  As a result of that election the progressive agenda has been sent back by decades.  Heck, our environmental protection was stronger under Nixon than it is now!

 

If the people of the Green Party really wanted to make a difference, if they really wanted to push forward a progressive agenda, they could do so much more effectively if they were part of the Democratic Party than they can separately!  Think about it.  If the most progressive and liberal Democrats boycott the party in favor of another, what happens to the Democratic Party as a whole?  We become more conservative.  If all of the true progressives in this country were active in the Democratic Party, our party would be considerably more in line with a truly populist agenda, and it is likely that so much of what we have been fighting for during the Bush administration’s rule would already have been achieved.  With these ‘progressives’ on our side, the left wing of the Democratic Party would have considerably more power, and the progressive agenda would be able to gain serious momentum.

 

If our governmental system was such that congress was parliamentary; if we apportioned seats by party voting percentages in the general elections, then I could see using 3rd parties to steer legislation.  But that is not the way it works in America!  We are not Britain!  So, the question is why are we in politics?  If the goal is to be a dissenter, to always have something or someone to fight against, then I can see being a member of the Green Party (or the Libertarian or other “3rd party”).  But if the goal is to effect legislation, then for crying out loud do what will get that legislation passed!  If the goal is to pass progressive legislation for the good of all Americans and world citizens, then it stands to reason that members of the Green Party must recognize their role in the Democratic Party if they came aboard!  They would steer DEMs towards our shared progressive goal.  As it stands right now, the 3rd party system, particularly with respect to the Green Party, will only continue to hurt the progressive agenda on a national level as their presence increases the likelihood of a Republican victory (something that must be avoided at all costs IMHO).  A friend once referred to the Green Party as standing for “Get Republicans Elected Every November”.  Unfortunately for us, for them, and for all that our progressive agenda would benefit, I fear that friend is correct.

 

Posted in Democratic Party, Environment, George W. Bush, Harford County Green Party, Liberal, Politics, Progressive, Republican, Republican Party, Universal Health Care | Tagged: , , , | 6 Comments »

THE NO-LAW ZONE

Posted by trumanesque on July 25, 2007

This Bush administration is right out of Catch 22.  First the Justice Department fires prosecutors who don’t tow the party line.  When Congress investigates, the White House stonewalls, claiming executive privilege.  When White House officials refuse to answer questions (or don’t even show up), Congress threatens to hold them in contempt.  The White House then says it doesn’t matter if you find our people in contempt, we’ll just tell our prosecutors not to prosecute.  (I suppose if the prosecutors disobey and prosecute the contempt charges, they’ll be fired, and ’round we go again.)

 Executive-privilege scholar and professor Mark Rozell has called Bush’s claim “astonishing.”  It really is an outrageous position to take.  Under his theory, all the President has to do is say the magic words “executive privilege,” and he and his people would be untouchable.  They would be in the no-law zone–above the law for all purposes.  If he or a member of his administration knowingly breaks the law, he can claim the privilege and tell Justice not to prosecute.  He may as well declare himself Caesar.

 It’s time to reign in this runaway President.  Congressional leaders need to keep the pressure on Mr. Bush and show him that he is not above the law, and that this country doesn’t have a no-law zone–especially not for the head of the executive branch, who is supposed to enforce the law, not prevent its enforcement.

Of course, if a White House staffer is found in contempt, Mr. Bush can just issue a pardon.

Posted in Executive privilege, George W. Bush | Leave a Comment »

Young Americans are more progressive

Posted by Annie on June 27, 2007

Young Americans Are Leaning Left, New Poll Finds

by Adam Nagourney and Megan Thee of The New York Times

Young Americans are more likely than the general public to favor a government-run universal health care insurance system, an open-door policy on immigration and the legalization of gay marriage, according to a New York Times/CBS News/MTV poll. The poll also found that they are more likely to say the war in Iraq is heading to a successful conclusion.

The poll offers a snapshot of a group whose energy and idealism have always been as alluring to politicians as its scattered focus and shifting interests have been frustrating. It found that substantially more Americans ages 17 to 29 than four years ago are paying attention to the presidential race. But they appeared to be really familiar with only two of the candidates, Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton, both Democrats.

They have continued a long-term drift away from the Republican Party. And although they are just as worried as the general population about the outlook for the country and think their generation is likely to be worse off than that of their parents, they retain a belief that their votes can make a difference, the poll found.

More than half of Americans ages 17 to 29 — 54 percent — say they intend to vote for a Democrat for president in 2008. They share with the public at large a negative view of President Bush, who has a 28 percent approval rating with this group, and of the Republican Party. They hold a markedly more positive view of Democrats than they do of Republicans.

Click here to read the rest of the article.

Posted in Abortion, Barack Obama, Gay Marriage, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, Immigration, Leftist, Liberal, New York Times, Progressive, Universal Health Care | 4 Comments »